Share This

I.          Background 

3D publishing is just a 30-year old technology that is presently entering the main-stream, to fanfare this is certainly great. The usage of 3D printers has not however be prevalent despite the 3D printing industry’s double-digit (%) development within the last 12 months. The question is: is one thing holding it back?  Mainstream wisdom is that property that is intellectual driven innovation by producing competitors, which fosters improvements in technology due to the requirement for internet protocol address workarounds. Our Founding Fathers right here within the US were so devoted to this basic indisputable fact that they built IP defense to the Constitution. These days, any business this is certainly big let you know that the minimal monopoly of a patent or copyright gives them a start and finally fosters innovation and competitors.

Recently, some innovators have actually challenged the wisdom this is certainly old-fashioned arguing that IP stifles innovation. Applying this thinking to 3D publishing, they argue that patents have actually held back development in 3D printing technology and so because businesses fear so much getting sued, they don't spend the resources to research and develop technology. This minimizes competitors, which keeps prices high and builds barriers to help keep entrants which can be brand new affordable services and products out from the market.

Other individuals believe the point that is only 3D printing straight back is the technology itself––printers are generally also sluggish, also cumbersome or incapable of printing objects that individuals actually wish, partly because of limits in products.  Regardless of where one stands in this debate, the threat of a lawsuit is obviously real while the 3D Printing Patent Wars, just like the Smart Phones conflicts, are likely perhaps not too much along the pike. For example, Formlabs, Inc. increased millions because of its Form 1 printer that is 3D the crowd-funding platform Kickstarter. According to Formlabs, there have been no low-cost 3D printers that found the standard criteria associated with the fashion designer that is professional therefore “[a]fter a great deal of study, engineering, and experimentation, [they] figured on how exactly to get it done in a much, lower price, causeing the premium technology offered to everyone.”[1]

In November 2012, 3D Systems sued Formlabs and Kickstarter in District Court in South Carolina, alleging that the Form 1 printer infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,597,520 (the patent that is’520 to Smalley et al. entitled “Simultaneous Multiple Layer Curing in Stereolithography.”  3D Systems alleged that both businesses infringed at least statements 1 and 23 associated with the ’520 patent. Claim 1 recites:

1. An improved way of  stereolithographically forming a three-dimensional object by forming cross-sectional levels of said object from a material with the capacity of physical change upon experience of synergistic stimulation comprising the measures of obtaining information descriptive of said cross-sectional layers, creating said cross-sectional layers by selectively revealing stated material to said synergistic stimulation according to said information descriptive of said cross-sectional layers to build up the three-dimensional item layer-by-layer, the improvement comprising the actions of: modifying data descriptive of at the very least a portion of at least one cross-sectional level by copying said information coming from a very first cross-section up to a second cross-section; and making use of stated modified information in forming said object this is certainly three-dimensional.

Truly the only distinction that is considerable claims 1 and 23 is the fact that in claim 23 the data is altered by “shifting” instead of “copying” as with claim 1.  The patent that is’520 January 28, 2014, and after settlement talks with Formlabs, the outcome had been voluntarily dismissed on November 8, 2013.   This time around alleging that the Form 1 printer infringed eight more patents on the same day, 3D Systems sued Formlabs in District Court in New York.  These situations illustrate why many think expiring patents will open up the doorway to advancements within the technology: the inventions of expired patents tend to be easily designed for all to use, which might trigger investment this is certainly new development, and competitors.

Many observers have pointed out that some of the early printing that is 3D have previously expired.  For instance, U.S. Patent No. 4,575,330 to 3D Systems’ Chuck Hull entitled “Apparatus for Production of Three-Dimensional items by Stereolithography,” that has been dubbed by some because the U.S. that is“original stereolithography,” expired almost a decade ago.  Various other stereolithography that is early also expired many years ago, including: U.S. Patent No. 4,929,402 to Hull, U.S. Patent No. 4,999,143 to Hull et al., and U.S. Patent No. 5,174,931 to Almquist et al.  It had been the expiration of some Fused Deposition Modelling patents, such as U.S. Patent No. 5,121,329 to Stratasys’s Scott Crump, that apparently spawned a growth of growth in the consumer-level printing business that is 3D.

Before the very early FDM patents expiring, these printers cost thousands of dollars. A years which are few termination, FDM machines are priced at a huge selection of bucks together with open-source neighborhood embraced technology.  Or perhaps a termination with this development had been driven by these patents could be disputed, nevertheless the post-patent-expiration flood of low-cost, customer grade 3D printers excites people who think patents are holding technology back.  The conclusion of stereolithography patents may even ignite an larger increase in new 3D printers.

So is there reasons for the printing this is certainly 3D to be excited today?  You are already aware that news of expiring patents gets the community buzzing if you follow 3D printing closely.   A few articles have mentioned “key patents” that will shortly expire and permit the industry to explode.  What you probably have not seen may be the identification of the patents and an description for the technology this is certainly safeguarded.  This short article intends to highlight some patents being potentially crucial tend to be set to expire soon.

II.        Key Patents

Despite the fact that most early printing that is 3D expired long ago, additional exist that protect the basic technologies and 3D printer companies are filing brand new applications all the time, for essential new ways of doing things and incremental improvements. But many patents are expiring now and in the months that are coming.  Here they are, in chronological order based on expiration date, with those expiring soonest appearing first.[2]  The following is supposed to deliver a general description of some of the claimed topic matter in each patent although many of these patents disclose a number of inventions.  The metes and bounds of each patent is defined by its claims, so don’t rely only on this description that is general.

5,569,349– October that is expired 29 2013

Current Assignment Data Unavailable 

U.S. Patent No. 5,569,349 to Almquist et al. entitled Stereolithography that is“Thermal an apparatus of and way for supplying 3D objects through the principles of stereolithography using flowable materials.  The patent also discloses the fast substitution of materials throughout part building and the use of support materials that are easily removable from the part that is completed.  Using a CAD system, the device directs the nozzle to dispense material at selectively appropriate areas to form the part.  The movement is then blocked, allowing the material to harden, while the next section is formed in the way that is exact same.   An additional material (e.g., wax, thermoplastic, hot melt glue) can be used to fill voids for parts needing help.  The 2nd material can be removed from the ultimate part more readily by using a second product with a different melting point.

5,587,913 – Expired 14, 2013 december

Assigned to Stratasys

U.S. Patent No. 5,587,913 to Abrams et al. entitled “Method Employing Sequential Two-Dimensional Geometry for Producing Shells for Fabrication by a Rapid Prototyping System” discloses a method for creating 3D objects utilizing a computer-generated specification of a item that is solid interleave the look and building phases of production on a slice-by-slice basis.  Because the method will not require an explicit evaluation of the entire shell associated with object at the outset, it ostensibly reduces the total time required to generate a part that is finished.  The method can be operated with CAD and STL data and that can also be employed to create objects that are non-planar.

5,597,589 – Expiring January 28, 2014

Assigned to DTM Corporation

U.S. Patent No. 5,597,589 to Deckard entitled “Apparatus for Producing Parts by Selective Sintering” discloses an device for creating a object that is 3D powder.  The device comprises a way for successively dispensing a plurality of levels of powder onto a target area, an energy source (e.g., a laser), and a controller for directing the power source at places of each layer that is dispensed of at the target surface to fuse the powder and form a cross-section of the specified object.  An exhaust) for moderating the temperature difference between the unfused and fused powder to avoid undesirable shrinkage of the object being produced, the apparatus further comprises a temperature control means ( e.g.

5,609,812 – Expiring March 11, 2014

Current Assignment Data Unavailable

U.S. Patent No. 5,609,812 to Childers et al. entitled “Method of creating a object that is three-Dimensional Stereolithography” discloses a way of creating a 3D object from a medium that is solidifiable upon contact with synergistic stimulation (e.g., UV or IR radiation).  The innovation improves upon a known method that is stereolithographic involves selectively exposing layers of material to a beam of synergistic stimulation in a pattern to build up the 3D object layer by layer, in which the pattern includes paths of exposure defined by vectors.  The improvement disclosed in this patent comprises a technique of identifying an endpoint of a first vector and a newbie point of the 2nd vector, scanning the synergistic stimulation along the initial vector at a fixed velocity, and shuttering (i.e., mechanically blocking) the synergistic stimulation when it reaches the endpoint of the vector that is first.  The method further comprises directing the synergistic stimulation in a pattern to the start point of the 2nd vector, unshuttering the stimulation when it reaches the start point, and scanning the stimulation across the 2nd vector at a velocity that is constant.

5,609,813 – Expiring March 11, 2014

Current Assignment Data Unavailable

U.S. Patent No. 5,609,813 to Allison et al. entitled “Method of creating a Three-Dimensional Object by Stereolithography” discloses an device and technique of creating a 3D item from a medium that is solidifiable upon exposure to stimulation that is synergistic.  The method involves applying a layer of flowable material, generating and sequencing a pattern of exposure paths for the layer corresponding to a cross-section of the object, and exposing the exposure paths to synergistic stimulation in accordance with the sequencing to form a layer of the object that is 3D.  This technique is repeated until the object is created, but with the step of sequencing being altered with a different sequence of exposure on a minumum of one layer that is subsequent.

5,610,824 – Expiring March 11, 2014

Assigned to 3D Systems

U.S. Patent No. 5,610,824 to Vinson et al. entitled “Rapid and Accurate Production of Stereolithographic Parts” discloses an apparatus and method for producing a item that is 3D a medium that is solidifiable upon experience of radiation.  The method involves providing a container with the medium and creating a beam of radiation––having first and intensities that are second change from each other––at the medium to make cross-sections regarding the object.  The method further comprises scanning a primary line regarding the material with the beam having 1st intensity and scanning an extra line in the material using the beam having the intensity that is second.  The laser can be directed over portions for the material without curing any appreciable quantity by using a beam with different intensities.  This is often particularly useful for large and complex objects, where a more laser that is powerful needed.

5,503,785 – Expiring June 2, 2014

Assigned to Stratasys

U.S. Patent No. 5,503,785 to Crump et al. entitled “Process of Support Removal for Fused Deposition Modeling” discloses an activity for producing objects that are 3D overhanging portions easily suspending in space.  The procedure involves dispensing an initial, solidifiable material in a predetermined pattern to deposit multiple layers that define a 3D item and a different support structure that is 3D.  The support that is 3D lies under the overhanging portions of the thing, which require support during layer deposition.  A area is left involving the underside regarding the overhanging portions of the object and the medial side that is top of supporting framework.  An extra, release material is dispensed into the space in a multiple-pass deposition process coordinated with the dispensing of the material that is first.  The second material is of a different composition compared to the very first material in order that a breakable bond is created utilizing the material that is first.  This allows the support structures to be readily separable through the overhanging portions regarding the object, leaving only the item behind after removal.

5,637,169 – Expiring June 10, 2014

Current Assignment Data Unavailable

U.S. Patent No. 5,637,169 to Hull et al. entitled “Method of Building Three Dimensional Objects with Sheets” discloses techniques of creating a 3D object radiation that is utilizing.  One method involves dispensing a sheet of material capable of selective solidification onto a working area and forming successive cross-sections of the object by selectively exposing portions of each sheet to radiation that is electromagnetic.  After portions of this sheets solidify, unexposed regions of the sheets are removed and the method is repeated to form the thing that is 3D.  Two related methods are also disclosed, the main distinctions being this 1 incorporates sheets of insoluble material which become soluble upon contact with electromagnetic radiation and one other incorporates sheets of material which have the capability of selective cutting upon experience of radiation that is electromagnetic.

5,639,070 – Expiring June 17, 2014

Assigned to DTM Corporation

U.S. Patent # 5, 639,070 to Deckard entitled “Method for creating Parts by Selective Sintering” discloses a technique for producing a part that is 3D powder.  The technique involves dispensing an initial layer of powder onto a target area and directing power (e.g., a laser) at selected locations of the powder to fuse together a very first cross-section of the part, leaving powder that is unfused.  The step that is next dispensing an extra layer of powder over both fused and unfused portions of 1st layer and heating (e.g., with gasoline or a laser) the second layer of powder, but not all how you can its sintering temperature.  The technique further involves energy that is directing selected places of the second layer of powder to fuse together an extra cross-section associated with the part, while fusing the very first and second fused layers together.  This process can be repeated to form the component that is 3D.

5,494,618 – Expiring June 27, 2014

Assigned to 3D Systems

U.S. Patent No. 5,494,618 to Sitzmann et al. entitled “Increasing the Useful Range of Cationic Photoinitiators in Stereolithography” discloses a process of stereolithography when a object that is 3D built up by polymerizing cationically polymerizable monomers by the catalytic action of cationic photoinitiators activated by a moving beam of UV light, such as an Argon ion laser.  The monomers comprise, e.g., vinyl ethers and epoxides, which ensure it is possible to quickly cure the plastic ethers while leaving the epoxide largely uncured.  Any additional shrinking that occurs should not produce additional distortion of the object by post-curing the epoxides.  The procedure decreases the depth of cure and consequently enables production of thinner, more polymer that is accurate.

5,651,934 – Expiring July 29, 2014

Present Assignment Data Unavailable

U.S. Patent No. 5,651,934 to Almquist et al. entitled “Recoating of Stereolithographic Layers” discloses a technique for forming a item that is 3D adding subsequent layers to previously formed layers.  The method involves supplying a volume of a building medium that is capable of selective transformation that is physical exposure to synergistic stimulation and developing a uniform layer over a previously formed layer of material, including sweeping a smoothing element over the formerly formed layer to smooth the top for the building material.  Synergistic stimulation will be put on the building material to form the layer that is subsequent.  This process could be repeated to form the object that is 3D.  The patent also discloses an apparatus, which supplies the means for undertaking the method that is above.

5,555,176 – Expiring October 19, 2014

Assigned to Jerry Zucker

U.S. Patent No. 5,555,176 to Menhennett et al. entitled “Apparatus and Method for Making Three-Dimensional Articles Using Bursts of Droplets” discloses an apparatus and technique for making a object that is 3D successive bursts of flowable material.  The apparatus comprises a platform on which the droplets are placed, a material dispenser, and a dispenser placement means for advancing the dispenser along a path that is predetermined.  The build material dispenser may be, e.g., a jet including a actuator that is piezoelectric.  The device further comprises a processor for managing the dispenser and dispenser positioning means as well as the mechanical components.  The processor can further comprise a rush control means for operating the dispenser to dispense a series of bursts of material or a corner implies that are forming constructing a corner regarding the object.  Each burst in this apparatus is a plurality of successive droplets dispensed in relatively rapid succession to one another so that the product of the successive droplets combines at a target position in contrast to a droplet-by-droplet approach.

5,572,431 – Expiring October 19, 2014
Assigned to Jerry Zucker

U.S. Patent No. 5,572,431 to Brown et al. entitled “Apparatus and Method for Thermal Normalization in Three-Dimensional Article Manufacturing” discloses an device and method for producing a item that is 3D re-solidifying build materials using a temperature source.  The method involves dispensing a build material onto a platform to construct an item in layers which solidify after dispensing.  The object is then melted and heated so that it re-flows, and portions of the previously solidified building material are reshaped.  An object is produced by this process that more accurately reflects the predetermined coordinates and evens out area irregularities.  The device comprises a dispensing and platform means for jetting materials on the platform.  The device also comprises a heater, a body regarding the the heater, and position means for advancing the human body along a path that is predetermined temperature the object and reshape the previously solidified portions.

5,529,471 – Expiring February 3, 2015

Assigned to University of Southern California

U.S. Patent No. 5,529,471 to Khoshevis entitled “Additive Fabrication Apparatus and Method” discloses an apparatus for producing 3D items making use of fabrication that is additive.  The device comprises two nozzles for delivering fluid materials, two supply means for delivering material that is fluid each nozzle, and two control means for moving and positioning the nozzles with regards to the object being produced.  An feature that is extra of apparatus is the utilization of trowels, which enable fast creation of smooth areas with better accuracy.  The trowels permit creation of various forms using only the 2 trowels, rather of using an assortment of tools required in more sculpturing that is traditional plastering.

5,733,497 – Expiring March 20, 2015

Assigned to DTM Corporation

U.S. Patent No. 5,733,497 to McAlea et al. entitled “Selective Laser Sintering with Composite Plastic Material” discloses a technique for producing a object that is 3D fusing powder materials.  The technique involves using a layer of composite powder on a target area, where the powder that is composite of a polymer powder and a reinforcement powder.   A laser) is directed at selected locations of the powder layer to fuse the powder and form a cross-section of the specified object after the powder is applied to the outer lining, energy ( e.g.  This procedure is repeated as well as the powder that is unfused removed, leaving the formed 3D object.

5,762,856 – Expiring June 9, 2015

Assigned to 3D Systems

U.S. Patent No. 5,762,856 to Hull entitled “Method for Production of Three-Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography” discloses a technique of producing a 3D object from a material that is effective at solidifying upon visibility to radiation or stimulation that is synergistic.  The technique involves providing a shower of a medium that is curable a container and exposing it to heat or stimulation to form a lamina of an object.  A new layer of medium will be subjected to heat or stimulation to form another lamina because the previously formed lamina is lowered in the bath.  This process is repeated to form the object that is 3D.


Anyone who is interested in this technology should fully examine the specification and claims in each patent, as this article provides only a broad description of some regarding the claimed matter that is subject.  Remember, the claims define the scope of the patent.

You'll note that these patents cover some of the technology that is fundamental of printing.  Whether the excitement over the expiration of these patents is met with an explosion or a dud is unknown.  Also unknown is as soon as the major battles of the 3D Printing Patent Wars will begin.  New regulations, evolving technology, plus an unpredictable economy might affect 3D printing more than any of these patents.  Hence, it might be imprudent to state that the expiration of just one or more of these is the key to growth because the market can dictate otherwise.  For now, we shall need to wait and see.

No comments:

Post a Comment